• Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coste, B. et al. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483, 176–181 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, A. H. & Grandl, J. Mechanical sensitivity of Piezo1 ion channels can be tuned by cellular membrane tension. eLife 4, e12088 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, B. Levering mechanically activated Piezo channels for potential pharmacological intervention. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 60, 195–218 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kefauver, J. M., Ward, A. B. & Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nature 587, 567–576 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ge, J. et al. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature 527, 64–69 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, L. et al. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel PIEZO2. Nature 573, 225–229 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, Q. et al. Structure and mechanogating mechanism of the Piezo1 channel. Nature 554, 487–492 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saotome, K. et al. Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1. Nature 554, 481–486 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, Y. R. & MacKinnon, R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. eLife 6, e33660 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, Y. C. et al. Force-induced conformational changes in PIEZO1. Nature 573, 230–234 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, Y., Yang, X., Jiang, J. & Xiao, B. Structural designs and mechanogating mechanisms of the mechanosensitive piezo channels. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 472–488 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, J. et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature 515, 279–282 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ranade, S. S. et al. Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10347–10352 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, F. et al. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel mediates heart mechano-chemo transduction. Nat. Commun. 12, 869 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, S. et al. Endothelial cation channel PIEZO1 controls blood pressure by mediating flow-induced ATP release. J. Clin. Invest. 26, 4527–4536 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rode, B. et al. Piezo1 channels sense whole body physical activity to reset cardiovascular homeostasis and enhance performance. Nat. Commun. 8, 350 (2017).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, W. et al. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation. eLife 8, e47454 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cahalan, S. M. et al. Piezo1 links mechanical forces to red blood cell volume. eLife 4, e07370 (2015).

    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Solis, A. G. et al. Mechanosensation of cyclical force by PIEZO1 is essential for innate immunity. Nature 573, 69–74 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marshall, K. L. et al. PIEZO2 in sensory neurons and urothelial cells coordinates urination. Nature 588, 290–295 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nonomura, K. et al. Piezo2 senses airway stretch and mediates lung inflation-induced apnoea. Nature 541, 176–181 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ranade, S. S. et al. Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice. Nature 516, 121–125 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woo, S. H. et al. Piezo2 is the principal mechanotransduction channel for proprioception. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1756–1762 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woo, S. H. et al. Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction. Nature 509, 622–626 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeng, W. Z. et al. PIEZOs mediate neuronal sensing of blood pressure and the baroreceptor reflex. Science 362, 464–467 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chesler, A. T. et al. The role of PIEZO2 in human mechanosensation. New Engl. J. Med. 375, 1355–1364 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szczot, M. et al. PIEZO2 mediates injury-induced tactile pain in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaat9892 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. A lever-like transduction pathway for long-distance chemical- and mechano-gating of the mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nat. Commun. 9, 1300 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, Q., Zhou, H., Li, X. & Xiao, B. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel: a three-bladed propeller-like structure and a lever-like mechanogating mechanism. FEBS J. 286, 2461–2470 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Geng, J. et al. A plug-and-latch mechanism for gating the mechanosensitive Piezo channel. Neuron 106, 438–451.e436 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, A. H. & Grandl, J. Inactivation kinetics and mechanical gating of Piezo1 ion channels depend on subdomains within the cap. Cell Rep. 30, 870–880.e872 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, W., Gracheva, E. O. & Bagriantsev, S. N. A hydrophobic gate in the inner pore helix is the major determinant of inactivation in mechanosensitive Piezo channels. eLife 8, e44003 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Vecchis, D., Beech, D. J. & Kalli, A. C. Molecular dynamics simulations of Piezo1 channel opening by increases in membrane tension. Biophys. J. 120, 1510–1521 (2021).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, L. & Sigworth, F. J. Structure of the BK potassium channel in a lipid membrane from electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 461, 292–295 (2009).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, X., Fan, X. & Yan, N. Cryo-EM analysis of a membrane protein embedded in the liposome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18497–18503 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baxa, U. Imaging of liposomes by transmission electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 1682, 73–88 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Snijder, J. et al. Vitrification after multiple rounds of sample application and blotting improves particle density on cryo-electron microscopy grids. J. Struct. Biol. 198, 38–42 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tonggu, L. & Wang, L. Cryo-EM sample preparation method for extremely low concentration liposomes. Ultramicroscopy 208, 112849 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lei, J. & Frank, J. Automated acquisition of cryo-electron micrographs for single particle reconstruction on an FEI Tecnai electron microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 150, 69–80 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, M. et al. A particle-filter framework for robust cryo-EM 3D reconstruction. Nat. Methods 15, 1083–1089 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, M. et al. Convolutional neural networks for automated annotation of cellular cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 14, 983–985 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link